Masterpiece Cake,
as it will be known forevermore, was decided yesterday. I worked a tiny tiny
bit on this case when I interned for ACLU of Colorado, which is pretty cool,
notwithstanding the fact that I really added no discernable value. Charlie and
David are lovely, though.
Yesterday morning, I joined the chorus of sighs as I heard
the headline. It was foolish for me to jump to conclusions before reading the
actual opinion.
One matter that I am not seeing discussed enough in the
media is the Court’s comments that it was relevant that the incident that spawned
this lawsuit occurred pre-Obergefell
(the SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision). The Court suggested that the baker’s
assumption that there was nothing illegal about refusing to make a cake for a
gay wedding was bolstered by the fact that same-sex marriage was not recognized
in Colorado at the time. That means that this case likely has little
precedential value for any dispute arising since June of ’15.
The majority opinion itself little precedential value anyway;
that’s what is meant when you keep hearing that the ruling is “narrow.”

