I am not sure if it is still commonly believed that high school and college athletics are clean and honest, or if "everyone" is aware of the collusion that goes on so that athletes move through the educational system without getting an actual education.
Of course, the
discussion of the tension between college athletics and academics shows up
mostly with respect to men's football and basketball. I refuse to use the term “revenue-generating
sports,” because the idea that such sports generate sufficient revenue to
sustain both the university in general and other – usually women's – sports, is a myth. Studies attempting to find correlations between athletic success and donations have been inconsistent, and one 2012 study suggests that even if a successful athletic team does spike giving, such an increase only affects the athletic department itself.
Of course, college sports programs have a value to a university beyond the bottom line; I've met many students who want "the complete college experience," which for them includes tailgates and football games. I recruited for a major public university for 10 years, and I understand that athletic programs are crucial in recruiting a certain type of student.
And I like sports. I like sports a lot. You'll find me spending a good amount of my spare time being a spectator, and not just for my favorite non-American flavors: rugby and soccer. Sundays during the NFL season are booked in perpetuity. Baseball games are constantly on in the background while we barbecue during the summer, and I'll bandwagon when the Avs or Blackhawks are doing well. Basketball's not my thing, but I respect it.
So yes, I like sports a whole lot, but I can't tell you the last time I watched and/or cared about a college game. I just can't watch them anymore, because as I watch, I can't stop thinking about how utterly screwed a good number of these children I'm watching are. College sports can
exist without gutting the futures of the athletes.
These kids – mostly black, largely poor – are sold a lie.
They’re promised that their athletic prowess will guarantee them success, and
their education is only relevant to the extent that it facilitates their
athletic career. Your grades are only a problem if they affect your eligibility
(and that’s a pretty low bar). And if they do, we’ll help you make sure they
don’t. And this is just at the high school level.
At the college admissions stage, admissions offices can put
up a roadblock, but if the athletic department really, really, really wants a particular kid,
roadblocks can be bypassed. Keith Frazier is an example, but he’s not
exceptional.
Every single one of those kids who gets recruited by a
college to play, academics be damned, expects to play on the big, professional
stage. But less than two percent of college athletes go on to play
professionally. When the athletic departments are trying to get their wins on
the table, it doesn’t matter to them that Tyson the defensive back is never
going to get into the NFL. They need him, and therefore he can’t waste time
writing this silly philosophy paper.
“But without athletic scholarships, these kids might not go
to college at all!” That’s true, and I seriously appreciate the theory of athletic
scholarships as a means to a college education. But what has happened is that
an athletic scholarship has become a replacement
for a college education, to the extent that a student-athlete is an athlete
first, and a student second, if at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment